Friday · May 30 · 2026 · Issue № 014
· New episode Friday
Digital Sovereignty Audit DeclarationMethodologyGrading systemLeaderboardState audits← Thinkers Dilemma
Weekend EditionA Thinkers Dilemma Series

Digital Sovereignty Audit

Fifty states, one question, graded on a published rubric. If your data were taken from you tomorrow, what could you actually do about it?

Last verified · Rubric v1.1

The Standard
If your data were taken from you tomorrow, sold, leaked, subpoenaed, or used in a way you never agreed to, what, in this state, could you actually do about it?

If the honest answer is nothing, the state does not have digital sovereignty. It has a privacy policy.

№ 01The leaderboardShowing 12 of audited · 50 by

The spread, state by state

№ 02What the audits show so farFindings
01

The best score is a .

leads the board with a .

02

Money is not sovereignty.

Texas has collected about $2.78B in privacy settlements, and no Texas resident has standing to sue. Enforcement dollars and citizen power are different things.

03

Having a law is not having a remedy.

Virginia, with a comprehensive statute and no publicly announced enforcement action found, outscores Illinois by two points, 33 to 31. Illinois has no comprehensive law and the strongest private remedy in the country, for biometrics only.

№ 03Five pillars, one scoreFull grading system →

Accountability and Ownership carry the most weight. Accountability is the only pillar that can invalidate the others: a state can score well on the first four and still be worthless if nobody can sue.

№ 04How an entry worksMethodology →

Read the statute for its exemptions

The audit reads the law the way a lawyer for the other side would, starting with who it leaves out.

Score five pillars from criteria

Every pillar is 0 to 100, built from fixed criteria with fixed points. Laws are scored as enacted, never as pending.

Apply the penalty and the Reality Test

States with a comprehensive law lose points for exemptions. The Reality Test can cap a score the arithmetic flatters.

Publish the score and the forecast

Each entry ships with a 500-word article, a date stamp, and the pre-registered forecast next to the result.

№ 05Updates since auditNewest first
The policy

Every entry carries a date stamp and a dated log of changes since the audit. A score changes only when an enacted, in-force change moves a rubric criterion, and the change is published here. The ruler stays frozen. The world is allowed to move.

№ 06On the watch listNot scored
№ 07Next in the seriesOne state a week
Entry of 50

The first audited state where a resident can personally sue over a data violation, if only for health data.

The weekend edition

One state graded every week for fifty weeks, with the score, the article and the forecast published together. Free on Substack.

Subscribe